After having watched and loved the play last year, I was excited to finally get my hands on the book. For those unfamiliar, wicked unravels the story of The Wizard of Oz from the point of view of the wicked witch of the west, Elpaba. But while the play painted the witch as a well meaning misunderstood rebel, the book portrays a darker picture of a woman coarsened by circumstances. Of course this darker portrayal makes the darker ending more digestible. Nonetheless, it leaves the reader with a feeling of melancholy.
The book starts with Elphaba’s birth and arrival of the wizard in Oz. It follows Elphaba’s journey through Shiz university where she befriends Glinda and Fiyero. After Shiz, she disappears in the Emerald city, where she joins underground rebel forces fighting against the wizard for Animal rights. It is here that she reconnects with Fiyero and starts a love affair. This part of the story is common to the book and the play, and is arguably the best chapters of the book.
The second half of the book jumps seven years forward, where Elphaba now has a seven year old son from Fiyero, named Liir. Most of the incidents in this part of the book are not shown in the play, probably because they show the worst sides of Elphaba. Specifically, how she has no motherly feelings towards Liir and completely neglects him, almost leading to his death by another child. Then as revenge, she kills the other child.
The book had the potential to be a good read, had I read it without seeing the play. What made the play so great, was its depiction of the friendship between Elphaba and Glinda, which is merely touched upon in the book. Further, the play offered reasonable but completely different explanations to the incidents of wizard of oz, which gave it the characteristics of a mystery unfolding, tied together beautifully at the end. The book does no such thing, hence I kept looking for alternative explanations where there were none provided. I do plan to read the other two books in the series.